CDIA excludes debt management plans from the DS code by name. The industry’s own survey ranks telling settlement apart from DMP and credit counseling among the top obstacles to reporting. This page explains the difference — and why a verification source that cannot draw the line cannot answer the DS question.
To a reporting team, an enrolled consumer and a DMP consumer present almost identically: payments stop or change, a third party contacts the creditor, paperwork arrives. The survey found telling them apart the second-hardest part of DS readiness.
Some enrollment databases hold both settlement and DMP records in one table. A hit from such a database tells you the consumer is in something — but not which something. Since only one of the two qualifies for DS, that hit cannot answer the reporting question, and furnishing on it would report DS for consumers CDIA expressly excluded. Verification must be settlement-only, per hit, not per database.
Contribution is program-qualified: settlement companies submit enrollment update files as programs with statuses (enrolled, performing, completed, dropped out), and the network carries no counseling records at all. A DS verification can only ever come from a settlement enrollment record — the DMP question is answered by construction, not by judgment.
No. The Bulletin excludes debt management plans and credit counseling arrangements from DS explicitly. If your verification source cannot distinguish the two, it cannot support a DS report.
Enrollment records carry statuses and dates. An engagement that never became an active program is not a qualifying enrollment — and grades accordingly (see the evidence standard).
Start with a mutual NDA and one file. We review the file you are about to transmit, hand back the corrections with the evidence behind each one, and you decide what reports.
Get Started